My dear brothers, friends, and family,I bow before the splendor of the Supreme Architect’s presence animating our life and our world.  We should ever remember to have Faith that the G.A.O.T.U. (Great Architect of the Universe) has created us and the world in his vision.  We should ever remember to have Hope that when our earthly opportunity to work and spread love is finished that we will be absorbed into the unity of His Grace, and we should of necessity remember always to  demonstrate  the  Charity  of  forgiveness  and  compassion  to  all  whom  we interact with, remembering that at all of our core lies the the sameness quality that is the Great Architect’s awareness.

However, purity of vision means not “believing”, not having “faith” in that which we were taught.  Purity of vision means standing in the center of the circle of the Monad and looking for one’s self at the information that other scholars interpreted and decide for our own self what it means.  You are all as smart and as capable as those historians whom we chose to believe in high school and college, but now as Free Men, Free Thinkers, indeed, Freemasons, we are most certainly allowed to make up our own mind, and in the process the real secrets of Freemasonry may be revealed to you.

Here in this column we are on a path of discovery of a lost set of secrets encoded in the fabric of Freemasonry that have to do with who we really are, our real history, and a lost technology that was used to build the megalithic stone  buildings,  from  pyramids  to  cathedrals,  that  abound  on  the  planet  from a previous time.  We have been reminded of the lesson of the Monad, the point within the circle, that teaches us that the secret to who we really are lies in the sameness quality of experience and how to observe without being moved by the ego, that incessant voice in our heads which decides what things we see means, and is usually wrong.  We have looked at dielectricity, or aether, and how Quantum Mechanics makes the mistake of reification, that of making an object out of a posterior attribute.  Our very brief glance at dielectricity hints at something worthy of a further look, that of frequency and vibration, and we’ll get to that, all towards our goal of looking at the architecture that abounded in Europe and in this country in the formative years of Freemasonry, but right now we have to take a look at the chronology of our world’s history so we have a context to look at those buildings in, for if we don’t understand the dating, we’ll just be guessing at the time periods.

The Flemish Abraham Ortelius is considered to be the creator of the first Michael’s Masonic esoterica
modern  atlas  of  the  world,  the  Theatrum  Orbis  Terrarum.    He  is  said  to  be the first to suggest the continents were originally all connected before drifting to their present position.  He is said to have lived from 1527-1598.  Looking closely, his map is very baffling.  It is said to have been made in 1574 based on the date on the map.  That would make it 82 years after the supposed discovery of America, and yet all the main rivers in South America are accurately drawn on the map.  That areas of dense tropical jungle could have been thoroughly mapped in such a short time is questionable on it’s own, but what I really want to draw your attention to is the date on the map.  It is quite obvious that the 1 in the date of 1574, is not at all a 1.  It is a J.  It is well known and accepted among historians that early dating used either a J, an i or an X before the date to indicate Jesus, Iejus, or Christos (Xristos), each used to refer to a count of years after Jesus. 

Further, this J is separated from the 574 numbers by a slightly larger space than the numbers have.  The map quite clearly was not made in 1574, but rather 574 years after Jesus.

Let’s  look  at  another  cartographer,  Levinus  Hulsius.    He  is  said  to  have  been born in Belgium in 1546.  He was a maker and dealer in fine scientific instruments.  He was a publisher and printer, a linguist and a lexicographer, and  he  wrote  extensively  on  geometry.    His  maps  are  considered  to  be  genuine.  On one of his most famous maps, there is a very peculiar date.  We are told that it is 1598, but the 1 is separated from the 598 digits by a large space, and the 1 clearly does not look like a 1, but rather is a capital letter i (I’m not sure the font this will be printed in will show a capital i correctly, so I use a lower case i here).  So the map was not made in 1598, but rather 598 since Jesus.Let’s  look  at  one  more  cartographer,  Nicolaes  van  Geelkercken.    He  is  considered an authentic surveyor and cartographer who lived from 1585-1656.  He was employed by the Gelderland government, and he is well known for his manuscript maps.  The dates on his maps are very clear.  On one map that I am looking at right now, the date is quite clearly 587 with a J in front of it.  This is not a conspiracy theory kind of thing.  The use of the i, J, or X is well accepted among historians for it’s reference to Jesus, yet clearly there is a disconnect between the dates on these maps and when historians tell us the cartographers that made them lived.

I found an emblem of the beautiful city of Vilnius, the ancient and current capital of Lithuania (where our Masonic brother Ed Leedskalnin was from, famous for Coral Castle in Florida and who’s “Permanent Magnet Holder invention is demonstrated in our lodge’s sculpture of the Monad, or Point Within a Circle).  It is recorded in the history books that the city was first
recognized in 1323, yet this emblem I am looking at clearly has a date of Anno•VII, the seventh century, not the 14th.

Let’s look at the German historian August Ludwig von Schlozer.  He is well accepted by modern historians for his critical study of Russian history.  He is recorded by accepted history as having lived from 1735 to 1809, yet an image of him from the time of his life very clearly shows the date as i 735, not 1735.

There  are  thousands  of  examples  of  art,  sculptures,  maps,  and  historical  figures where history tells us the dates are in the 1000 era, but if we go look at the date for ourselves on the artwork, sculptures, maps, coins, and images of historical figures, we see the date is not in the 1000’s at all, but that the first character of the dates is an i, J, or x, often separated from the actual date numbers by a dot on either side of the i, J, or X to further set it apart as a date “from the time of Jesus”.  How did this extra 1000 years of dating get added to our historical timeline?

Anatoly  Fomenko,  a  Russian  mathematician,  wrote  a  series  of  7  books  about his research into the dating of historical events in Europe and found hundreds of examples of genealogies repeated over and over to make up this extra one thousand years that was added to our history.  This fabrication occurred with the development of the Gregorian Calendar.  Our modern concept  of  medieval  and  ancient  history  begins  in  Europe  at  about  1518  with a series of works by Joseph Scaliger, a French religious leader.  These works were expanded in 1630 by Denis Petau, a French theologian.  They each used scraps of scroll remnants, biblical texts, and calendars they had inherited  and  took  it  upon  themselves  to  bring  chronology  to  perfection  with absolutely precise dating including month, day and even time of death of principal events in all of human history.  In 1583 Scaligar wrote “Study of the Improvement of Time” in which he looked at old calendars and corrected what he presumed to be their errors.  Both historians made exact time line lists of events and people based on “faith”.  Scaligar for example could not even conceive of the idea of running a check on the chronology of the holy fathers  and  looked  at  previous  history  work  done  by  biblical  scholars  as  “divine”.  The basis of today’s modern historical dating rests primarily with the work of these two men, and yet their work is showed repeatedly to be more than flawed, but rather flat out made up out of thin air.

Fomenko looked first at astronomical events recorded in Scaliger’s historical timeline, and looked to see if such events (eclipses, comets, etc.) really lined up with the years they were said to have happened based on Scaliger and Petau’s  chronology,  and  found  they  did  not  jive  at  all.    Sir  Isaac  Newton 
was  one  of  the  first  to  question  the  Scaliger  timeline,  and  wrote  several  books on the subject.  He was the first to suggest that a thousand years had been mistakenly added to our history.  Fomenko’s work is substantive and clearly demonstrates that did indeed happen.  Now today’s researchers are looking at maps, coins, art, and architecture and finding that not only did this happen, but in very many cases the i, J, or X in the dates on buildings and artwork have been defaced to try to make them look like the numeral 1.  The changes went largely unnoticed for centuries, but in today’s world of Photoshop where we have become used to spotting subtle doctoring of images, the crude defacing of these old dates is very obvious.

What  this  means  to  us  when  we  begin  to  look  at  architecture  is  all  these  “ancient”  events  and  buildings  are  not  so  ancient  after  all.    The  so  called  Greek and Roman eras were a thousand years more recent (I say “so-called” because  as  we  will  learn  those  were  just  labels  put  on  regions  of  a  global  empire).  The destruction of the Greek and Roman megalithic stone buildings was not from extreme age, but a cataclysmic event.  Jesus lived a thousand years more recent than we’ve been taught.  The addition of this thousand extra years into our timeline basically pushed recent events into the distant past  where  they  would  not  be  scrutinized.    But  now  we  are  scrutinizing  them, and we will see that something dramatic occurred in our recent past.  Something globally cataclysmic.  Something that caused us to forget who we are and our technology.  Something that happened during the period of photography,  so  we  have  photographic  evidence  as  well.    Something  that  occurred during the formative years of the Great Craft of Freemasonry